Bilerico contributor Don Sherffick testified before the recent House Committee meeting on SJR-7, noting that the language for the flawed second paragraph of the bill originally came from an early draft of the Federal version of the amendment - a draft that was later re-written considerably. That revelation caused some comment and concern amongst committee members.
And now Advance Indiana is reporting about why the Fed version was rewritten - Ed Fox has discoverd that ultra-conservative Judge Robert Bork realized the ambiguities of the language were too great, and directed the language should be changed.
The question now is whether Indiana Senator Brandt Hershmann chose the flawed original language accidentally, and now just refuses to change it because the process is so far along, or whether he chose it deliberately to restrain the legislature as well as the courts, and is now just lying to his fellow legislators about the consequences of the flawed language.
Leave a comment